Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is argued by some individuals that authority should consume invest in faster public transport. Others do not agree and believe that capital should be utilized on different hurdles of public transport like cost reduction and securing the environment. This essay will discuss both aspects followed by personal opinion.
To begin with, improvement in speed transport is essential to curtail the travel time from one location to another. Faster public transport like metro trains can allow individuals to travel long distances in short durations without getting stuck in traffic congestions. Therefore it is valid and useful for the government to spend money on such projects. For that reason, various crowded and developing nations are looking to acquire faster public transport means like high-speed rail projects, such as, in India, the government is spending a huge amount in metro projects across the nation since their first successful development of Delhi metro project.
However, other aspects are equally pivotal for any nation to curb pollution and other environmental problems, thus the government should seek the identification of different problems emerging in the public transportation system. For instance, the smog problems due to fuel cars in India is currently at saturation level, therefore, the alternative to these vehicles like electric transportation is getting introduced these days on Indian roadways. Hence, each year the authorities are increasing the budget for electric cars to promote more use of these vehicles.
In my opinion, I believe that for the sake of advancement and development of a nation, the government should spend more money on faster public transport.
In conclusion, although, the repair in current transport is vital to maintain the environment, I consider the faster transportation is way more beneficial for the nation growth, hence, the state must utilize more money in such projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-09 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | bhatvishal@ | 84 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 11
- As global trade increases between different countries many daily necessities are produced in other countries Such goods are usually transported a long distance Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its disadvantages 62
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter• give contact details for where you are away• give instructions about how to care for your pet• describe other household duti 73
- You play a team sport with some friends. Last week a member of the team had an accident and wasn't able to play with you at the weekend. You decide to write to him in hospital, telling him about the match.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter 78
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...y will discuss both aspects followed by personal opinion. To begin with, improvement in speed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t getting stuck in traffic congestions. Therefore it is valid and useful for the governme...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54026845638 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92201731974 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3915910198 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.583333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348234231733 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138771374149 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104098772778 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218335308326 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102885721152 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.