The pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by Abimbola1 on Sun, 08/04/2019 - 07:24

The pie charts depict the changes in yearly expenditure by an institution in the United Kingdom in 1981, 1999 and 2001.

Overall, teachers' salaries experienced just a little change within the 3-year period and it had the highest percentage of all. The least recorded percentages were for insurance in all the years.

In 1981, about 40% of the total expenditure was for teachers' salaries, there was a 10% increase on it in 1991, while in 2001, it has just a 5% increase. Other workers' salaries on the other hand had a percentage of 28% in its starting year, this reduced to 15% in the last year. In addition, resources and books account for 15% of the total spending in 1981 and just 9% in 2001.

Furthermore, insurance which was the least category being spent on, had its percentage increase from the starting year to the last year with a difference of about 6% from 1981 to 2001. However, furniture and equipment had its highest proportion in 2001 (23%) and its lowest (5%) in 1991.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-25 Noah1997 33 view
2020-01-22 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2019-11-11 Pamela K 56 view
2019-09-19 Saeed Najd Ataei 78 view
2019-08-04 Abimbola1 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Furthermore, insurance which was the least category being spent on, had its p...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, as for, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68390804598 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6076822287 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5847807794 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121587186507 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623375891385 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555940126883 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882862810317 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564838073556 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.