Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.
Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing the action.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
Morality of an action is a debatable topic, because of the different perspective with which the witnesses observe, judges whether the action was sound on the moral grounds. In other words, the frame of perceptive from which the person is viewing, decides the morality of an action. In the statement it is claimed that the action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action. An action should not tested on the grounds of morality by considering the intentions of the person. I disagree with the statement. In the following paragraphs I will be presenting few compelling arguments to bolster the stand taken.
In my opinion, an action's morality must checked considering the intentions of the person performing the actions. If the intentions were not good, instead they were fiendish, inspite of that somehow the action resulted in good rather than bad, the person should not be considered moral. This scenario itself comes out to sound as immoral. If we somehow consider the actions moral based on the mere output of the action, it implies that we consider the actor as moral person. But possessing diabolic intentions, how can we trust the person in the future that further actions of the actor will be moral too.
Moving on, checking the morality of an action based on the output is impetuous. In the rarest of the circumstances will the action that was performed with bad intentions be resulting in good rather than bad for the apparent "beneficiary". It does not gaurantee that in the future the person on the other side will be propitious enough that odds will turn out to be in the favor of the person again.
However, not considering the bigger picture, if we consider the actions moral merely based on the output, and appreciate the actor inspite of "not good" intentions behind the action. It might result in extermination of bad intentions of the actor. This might help the actor in self realization that the joy of doing good is way more that satisfaction of vengeance.
To sum up, I would like to assert that if we consider the bigger picture, the actions must not be regarded as moral only based on the output ignoring the action. However, the person with bad intentions must be paid attention to and should be dealt with to ensure further safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | Gre user | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | aryastark282 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | thinker3000 | 33 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | thinker3000 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Md. Mehdi Hasan | 58 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 73
- the society must prepare its younger generation for leadership in various sectors of the nations by instilling in them with the sense of cooperation rather than competition. 54
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 58
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 485, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'test'
Suggestion: test
...s from the action. An action should not tested on the grounds of morality by consideri...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'actions'' or 'action's'?
Suggestion: actions'; action's
...r the stand taken. In my opinion, an actions morality must checked considering the i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75485756701 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416256157635 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0266772264 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.894736842 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489172374727 0.243740707755 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180847601896 0.0831039109588 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180640126328 0.0758088955206 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302307095335 0.150359130593 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169356011181 0.0667264976115 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.