Communal online encyclopedia
The passage and the lecture are both about Communal Online encyclopedias. While the passage describes the problems of communal encyclopedias over the traditional ones , the lecture talks about the advantages of communal encyclopedias. The main points the passage and the lecture talk about are Errors, hacking and required information.
Firstly, the passage indicates how any random person without any expertise can change or edit the information in Communal online encyclopedias. This may result in lot of inaccurate information, as opposed to the traditional encyclopedias which is written only by trained experts. The lecture contradicts this by saying that the traditional encyclopedias have never been close to perfect and there were lots of mistakes there too. He also adds that it is easier to correct any information online when compared to the traditional encyclopedia.
The second point the passage emphasizes is on the hacking. Since any user has access to the online encyclopedia, there is a large chance of users corrupting the data. The lecture defends this statement by saying that they have found two resolutions to this problem. They have made the online encyclopedia as a read only format file, so that the crucial facts will be reliable. Also they have special editors in the team whose main work is to keep track of the changes the editor makes and eliminate any malicious information.
Finally, the author posits that the communal encyclopedia give too much information in depth.As a result of this, it is difficult to find out the important and unimportant information. The lecture opposes by saying that, the traditional encyclopedia is crisp as it has limited space and the online encyclopedia provides wide variety and diversity of information according to a user's interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... encyclopedias over the traditional ones , the lecture talks about the advantages ...
^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve never been close to perfect and there were lots of mistakes there too. He also...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hat the crucial facts will be reliable. Also they have special editors in the team w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...edia give too much information in depth.As a result of this, it is difficult to fi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34385964912 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0554659497 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8366562813 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391722855887 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138888261192 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104620567645 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260961693875 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621852984723 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.0289183223 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.