The bar graph demonstrates the percentage change in the price of houses in New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and London between 1990 and 2002 compared with the overage house price in 1989.
Overall, the cost of house changed from 1989 in New York and Tokyo declined, while both Madrid and Frankfurt experienced an upward trend. However, the most noticeable pattern was in the rate of London, by showing the most significant increase.
According to the graph, the average house price during 1990-1995 in Tokyo and London decreased by approximately 7% compared with the overage cost in 1989. Nevertheless, at the same period, Madrid and Frankfurt reached a price rise by about 1% and 1,5% respectively.
Besides, it is clearly evident that between 1996-2002, property price in London rose dramatically, by almost 12%. Meanwhile, the price of a house in New York, Madrid and Frankfurt climbed consecutively and indicated 5%, 4,5% and around 1%. In contrast to other cities, only London went trough 5% fall in average price of houses over the same milestone.
- The graph below shows the average monthly use of health club in Miami and Florida by all full-time members over last year. The pie charts show the age profile of male and female members. 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDiscuss both the 78
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and the comparisons whe 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13294797688 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75775252169 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8464965126 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31101015694 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142134931681 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930690770951 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214282996462 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087986684773 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.