The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

Submitted by jasir on Fri, 08/09/2019 - 22:51

The graph illustrates changes in the eating habits regarding fish and various types of meat in a particular European country over 25 years from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, the consumption rate of beef and lamb decreased dramatically over the given period, while there was an upward trend for chicken. At the start of the period, beef was the most widely eaten meat, however it was replaced by chicken in 1989.
The amount of beef consumed in 1979 was approximately 220 grams per person weekly, however, after some fluctuations, this figure then was halved and fell to about 110 grams in the last year. At the same time, the lamb intake experienced the similar pattern. It began at 150 grams, after which the consumption rate fluctuated slightly and dropped to around 60 grams in 2004.
On the other hand, less than 150 grams of chicken was eaten initially, however this kind of meat became the most preferred by people in the final years, reaching 250 grams in 2004. Unlike other kinds of meat, the consumption of fish stayed approximately on the same level with figures around 50 grams per person per week each year, making marine meat the least consumed.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates changes in the eat...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry over 25 years from 1979 to 2004. Overall, the consumption rate of beef an...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r it was replaced by chicken in 1989. The amount of beef consumed in 1979 was ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d dropped to around 60 grams in 2004. On the other hand, less than 150 grams o...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, so, then, while, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81909547739 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44771594567 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592964824121 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6285659133 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.875 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17809016942 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799412689146 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555906892648 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113775309425 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537668987565 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.