TPO-45
The reading and the lecture are both about the theory of bees have existed since 200 million years ago that is implied by some fossil records which have been discovered in the southwestern of the United States. Whereas the author of the reading states that those structures were not formed by bees the lecturer suggests that the arguments used in the reading are not convincing. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the passage by providing three reasons.
First and foremost, according to the reading, none of these fossil records is related to 200 million years ago. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He explains why and wherefore bees could not be preserved as fossils at that time. bees have fossilized typically in a sticky liquid produced by trees. Besides, these type of trees were rare at that time, so bees could not be preserved.
secondly, the reading states that flowering plants appeared on Earth 125 million years ago that has provided bees' food. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this reasoning. He argues that it is actually possible that bees existed before flowering plants emerged on Earth. In addition, he points out that they might have been feeding on non-flowering plants which existed at that time. Later when flowering plants evolved, bees may have adapted to feeding on them.
Finally, the passage climes that, indeed, these fossil records are probably similar to nest chambers made by modern bees but not completely. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that even though those nest chambers are not the same exactly but some chemical evidence which bees have used to make their nests waterproof are seen.
In conclusion, although the reading and lecture are both about bees existence, three main points made in the reading passage are effectively challenged by the professor.
- TPO34-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on a cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and ex 76
- TPO 39 - Independent task - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 76
- TPO-45 3
- tpo31 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the southwestern of the United States. Whereas the author of the reading states that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Bees
...t be preserved as fossils at that time. bees have fossilized typically in a sticky l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...time, so bees could not be preserved. secondly, the reading states that flowering plan...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, finally, first, however, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09933774834 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4441056588 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513245033113 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0620936264 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0823176063059 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343101500915 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0207108422815 0.0662205650399 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0456805229093 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279465382206 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.