The charts give information about the activities in which U.K. bachelors and postgraduates participated after college graduation apart from full-time work in 2008.
Overall, most of graduate and postgraduate students in the U.K. decided to pursue higher education after leaving college while volunteering was the least popular destination among the four mentioned ones. Besides, the number of graduates participating in each activity was higher than that of postgraduates.
In comparison to the number of graduates undertaking further study, which was 29,665, there were 3,500 graduate students engaging in voluntary work. After graduation, 17,735 bachelors had a part-time job while 16,235 graduates were unemployed, which was ten times higher than that of postgraduate students.
Turning to postgraduates, taking higher education was the most favourite destination with 2,725 students, followed by part-time work with 2,535 postgraduates. In contrast, there were 345 students volunteering after graduation. Finally, the number of unemployed postgradute students was 1,625.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many people decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it. This, they argue, leads to a more satisfying working life. To what extent do you agree with this view? What other things can people do in order to have a satisfying working life? 73
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 73
I am really surprised with
I am really surprised with the scores of 5.5 out of 9 because this essay is a copy from a published book.
For practice purpose, more
For practice purpose, more contents are expected. but this essay just has 152 words:
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
so e-grader gave a low mark.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, so, while, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09210526316 4.92477711251 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15975822211 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598684210526 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5134389182 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20687891072 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990808520457 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736470768081 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149812179677 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727980134985 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.04 11.4140731707 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.