Leisure activities of European adults
The graph presented reveals a slight difference of what European adults do during their leisure time
in 1985 and 1995. it is evident that the existence of computer and games significantly influence
people spending relaxation time in 1995.
In 80’s, watching TV was the most time-consuming leisure activities people spend with 32 per cent of
total free time a day, followed by hanging out for eat with 23 per cent. Subsequently, talking with
friends and with family were the common activities with percentage of 21% and 18%, respectively.
Meanwhile, others activities were spend 6 per cent.
On the contrary, adults live in 1995 were still spending their 30 per cent of their free time, a quite
drop from 1985, watching TV. However, computer games tempted adults to more spend their time on
it with 27 cent. in the meantime, a gradual rise of percentage has happened to talking-with-friend
activities from 21 per cent to 26 cent, besides adults spend less time talking to families with markedly
decrease of percentage to only 7 per cent, as well as for eating out.
A fascinating fact that more than a half of leisure time activities adults mainly spend is interacting
with screen (TV and Computer) rather than with people in the real life
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-09-01 | dorae | 67 | view |
2024-07-16 | dorae | 73 | view |
2024-07-16 | dorae | 67 | view |
2024-07-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
2023-09-01 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of differentages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feat 61
- Saving Endangered Animal 84
- Declining Education Standard 11
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo ur own knowledge or experience 61
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USAbetween 1920 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...g their leisure time in 1985 and 1995. it is evident that the existence of comput...
^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ely. Meanwhile, others activities were spend 6 per cent. On the contrary, adults li...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 96, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
...g their 30 per cent of their free time, a quite drop from 1985, watching TV. However, comput...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 12, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cents'.
Suggestion: cents
...to more spend their time on it with 27 cent. in the meantime, a gradual rise of per...
^^^^
Line 10, column 18, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...e spend their time on it with 27 cent. in the meantime, a gradual rise of percent...
^^
Line 11, column 35, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cents'.
Suggestion: cents
...iend activities from 21 per cent to 26 cent, besides adults spend less time talking...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, still, well, while, as for, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02380952381 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86431243308 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4092191047 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21565612186 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104660172435 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730928706448 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851112956674 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981016476873 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.