Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Museums and historical sites are considered as a treasure where people can experience and learn about many valuable things. But, it has been noticed that mostly tourists visit these places, rather than local people. Hence, I am going to discuss the reasons for this as well as measures which can make local people to visit these places.
To begin with, museums and historical sites play a crucial role in making someone's more intellectual and sharp because these places provide pragmatic opportunity to people to know many things. Many tourists visit these places due to manifold reasons. Firstly, tourists mostly like to visit these places because they are more interested in knowing history of any country, and these places are the best sources for knowing comprehensively about history whereas local people already remain familiar with the history, thus main reason of ignoring all these places. Secondly, the layout of museums and historical houses is likely to remain unchanged for many years which again constitute these places visually unattractive to the local inhabitants. However, these places always remain a centre of attraction for tourists. For instance, many tourists travel the Taj Mahal, which is one of the seven Wonders of the World, to know more about its architecture.
However, it has been found that local people less likely to visit these places, but with effective initiatives, local people can contribute more to these places in a multifarious way. Firstly, government should aware local people regarding importance of museum and historical sites so that they could know about importance of these places. Secondly, there should be a discount on tickets for local people as a result they can easily go to these places. Lastly, there should be various activities on these places so that native people could enjoy and this will further stimulate them to go there.
In conclusion, local people should know the importance of museums as well as historical sites, because these places not only generate myriad opportunities but also represent an identity of any nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-02 | Taeyeon Kim | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Taeyeon Kim | 73 | view |
- Some believe that lot of scientific research is a waste of time and money To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- With internet improvements, people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is this a good or a bad thing? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 100
- Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience. 100
- The number of older people is increasing in many parts of the world. What are the effects of this on society as a whole? What are the advantages or disadvantages of this trend? 100
- Some people believe that radio is the best way to get news while others think that TV is better for this purpose. Discuss both views, give your opinion and relevant examples. 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 162, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a multifarious way" with adverb for "multifarious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ple can contribute more to these places in a multifarious way. Firstly, government should aware local...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 335.0 242.827586207 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26865671642 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57702721764 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489552238806 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6638351988 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.071428571 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 7.25397266985 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48114413978 0.242375264174 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1925774278 0.0925447433944 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628145484954 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311555357621 0.151781067708 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852740078262 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.