Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

Generally speaking, museums are considered to be public facilities, which means they should they should be free to entry. Yet I believe the charge for admission is necessary, that’s to say the tickets do more good than harm.

Museum is a place to demonstrate history and culture. There is no doubt that cost-free museums will attract more visitors, and the exhibits inside will be more widely known. On the contrary, charged museums have fewer viewers, so the original intention of establishing a museum cannot be achieved very well. This is the main drawbacks of entrance fee.

However, despite the fact that fewer people may choose the charged museums, I think this is not a bad thing completely. First of all, museums need a certain amount of money to keep working. If a museum is always free, it is likely to lack the funds to maintain and upgrades, this would be not conducive to enhancing the experience of tourists. Secondly, the value of the exhibits in the museum varies, some small museums rely mostly on private donations, the cost is relatively low. As for some bigger museums, their artworks worth a lot of money, or they have cost a lot when they were collected at past time. For such a museum, even with the support of the local government, fees are very necessary.

Last but not least, tickets are a threshold in many cases. For those who want to go to the museum, learn about history, or improve their artistic literacy, they won’t mind paying a price. From another perspective, proper consumption can also make people more focused on viewing art. I dare say, improving the experience of tourists is more meaningful than simply pursuing quantity.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'they should'.
Suggestion: they should
...ed to be public facilities, which means they should they should be free to entry. Yet I believe the cha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... cost a lot when they were collected at past time. For such a museum, even with the suppo...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as for, i think, no doubt, first of all, in many cases, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92631578947 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61551588812 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1188588488 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.75 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296655485475 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834350336863 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567975420239 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168716588602 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489695232772 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.