Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph depicts information on the consumption of fruits and vegetables among men, women and children in the United Kingdom. The study covers a period from 2002 to 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest consumers belong to women while the least belong to children. It is also clear that all categories made an increment in 2006.
In detail, from 2002 to 2006, there was an increase in the proportion of women eating fruits and vegetables starting from 25 % to a high of 32 %. However, in 2010, it decreased to its almost similar rate which was posted during the initial year. The same trend was observed for men with a coverage of 22 % in 2002 which only had a 2 % increase by the end of the study period.
Conversely, children posted the lowest record at 11 % in 2002 which was followed by an increase of 18% in 2006 making it the highest rate noted in its category. However, this figure abated by 2 % four years after. By comparison, there was only a minimal increase for all groups of people who eat fruits and vegetables within the eight-year time frame.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Gaddam Ramya | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- Human activities make the world a better place to live in however do you agree or disagree that human activities do more harm than preserving the earth 86
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 67
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics. 73
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.609375 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49024727623 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588541666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9575409902 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166580383396 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640164632627 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431459746921 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101771468005 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03694492861 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.