Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television, newspapers, magazines, and other media pay too much attention to the personal lives of famous people such as public figures and celebrities. Use specific reasons and details to explain your opinion.
In today's world there are enormous ways of distributing news and making them available to the common people, like television, newspaper, magazines and internet. All these source wants to be profit and in order achieve that they want to put all big or small news and increase there popularity. One more source of gaining the same by reveling more information on people whom the common man knows or are fan of. Celebrities fit into this description of media reporter and photographer. So I strongly believe media pays much attention to the personal live of celebrities and public figures. Below are few reason to support the same.
Firstly, channels, magazines and newspaper get free publicity. The mass media reporter knows if they can find something new and any form of secret about any of the well knows face then they will be have huge profits along publicity of their name. In addition to this their news will spread like a wild fire. For Example recently an actor smoking video was leaking and the channel who reviled the info was know by the whole nation.
Secondly, as shows on personal lives and activities of famous people or celebrities are such huge success, they are good source of the revenue for the media industry. As a result, people are more drawn to such activities. Furthermore, the audience enjoy these news and viral in the society. For instance, Kareena kapoor's son, being of just 2-3 year old is still a favorite icon in media industry. He is immensely popular that they are miniature toys are being sold today.
Lastly, Not only media industry love this free promotions, in fact the the famous public or celebrity intentionally do the same to get publicity. They try to be famous or try to create controversies before anything important happening. Like, Actors create do something controversial to gain attention of the mass and promote their upcoming movies. In such senarios both the media industry and the individual get free promotion.
In conclusion, I agree it is a undenailable fact that famous pubic figures or celebrities get incrediable amount of attentions from the Media industry like magazines, Newspaper or Television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | Kumari Soni | 76 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Bijayani | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | nagy | 66 | view |
| 2018-08-16 | adam.joccob | 76 | view |
| 2017-07-25 | raghu18 | 65 | view |
- "To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people mov 50
- Do you agree with the following statement? Good teachers are more important to a child's development than good parents. Use specific details to support your argument. 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 46
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- You have enough money to purchase either a house or a business. Which would you choose to buy? Give specific reasons to explain your choice. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 598, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'few reasons'.
Suggestion: few reasons
...lebrities and public figures. Below are few reason to support the same. Firstly, chan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...nd the channel who reviled the info was know by the whole nation. Secondly, as ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...vities. Furthermore, the audience enjoy these news and viral in the society. For instance,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 68, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...stry love this free promotions, in fact the the famous public or celebrity intentionall...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 68, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...stry love this free promotions, in fact the the famous public or celebrity intentionall...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 30, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tion. In conclusion, I agree it is a undenailable fact that famous pubic fig...
^
Line 17, column 62, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...e it is a undenailable fact that famous pubic figures or celebrities get incrediable ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02770083102 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72642606143 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567867036011 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4377715819 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175096276317 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517976275497 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616399662947 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104545253808 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474019991398 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.