The graphs below shows proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The following graph shows us the recycling rate of different materials across the three decades.
The most recycled material in the data seems to be the paper and cardboard ranging from 65% to 70% across the time period with peaking at 80% during 1995. It is closely followed by the glass containers material which does keep up a steady state throughout the time line.
Next in line is aluminium cans. Although, it was introduced a bit later compared to the previous two materials. It's recycling rate has seen a progressive growth over the years. At last the plastic materials has the lowest recycling rate compared to all the other materials. It's the only material with below 10% rate at all times.
In conclusion, paper and cardboard along with glass containers are maintaining progressive growth. Meanwhile, the aluminium cans are catching up to the top with a significant surge at the recent years. For plastic there seems to be a little hope in terms of progression.
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates results in low art education. 73
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venuesand admission prices to those venues in 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant. 78
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion , is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local 67
- Structure your answers in logical paragraphs 11
- Some people believe that universities should make sport a compulsory module on all degree courses as rates of obesity are getting higher and higher. To what extent do you agree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 33, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e. Next in line is aluminium cans. Although, it was introduced a bit later compared...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 275, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...te compared to all the other materials. Its the only material with below 10% rate a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98181818182 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70165748533 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4713565165 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.7272727273 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153086247325 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565744734467 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737953732337 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111209755952 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917057140118 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.