Rembrandt is the most famous of 17 century
The passage claimed that the painting attributed to Rembrandt was not painted by himself because of some inconsistency and specific features which did not belong to Rembrandt. However, the lecture revised the reasons mentioned in the reading.
First, the controversy between servant's hat and her expensive cloth has been explained by professors, as she said, the fur color was overpainted lately to increase the painting value
Second, the assumption that based on the light absorbation of fur color the illumination should be decreased in woman's face, was rejected too. As described in the lecture the hat could reflect the light to woman's face
Finally, However, the reading alleged that the examination of painting frame indicate it is constituted of several wood glued together which is not in style of Rembrandt, the professor explained that the woods all were from one tree, and further investigation indicated that these types of woods also used in others Rembrandt painting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eased in womans face, was rejected too. As described in the lecture the hat could ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 1373.03311258 61% => OK
No of words: 156.0 270.72406181 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39743589744 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80976975011 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647435897436 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 135.145292186 49.2860985944 274% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 210.5 110.228320801 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 21.698381199 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06452816374 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0770947928199 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440304786446 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465328232289 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0420148005147 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427698141691 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 13.3589403974 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 53.8541721854 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.0289183223 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 11.2008830022 214% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.