People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world?
There is a big concern that people have limited knowledge of the significance of the natural environment. There are various reason why people do this, but governments could certainly take action to tackle this issue.
There are several reasons why people have not take enough care about the environment. Firstly, thousands of years of evolution has separated human beings from the other parts of the world. In the past, the Homo sapiens had to live in the forest to meet their basic needs such as water, hunting animals for food and making fire for warmth. However, because our lives has become more modernised and developed, we do not have to be near the natural world as we have all the most advanced technology. Therefore, people will neglect the importance of the nature. What is more, the education would be blamed for this problem as the governments put excessive attention on academic subjects. As a result, students would rather spend their time learning Maths, Physics, Literature to exploring the forests, jungle.
However, many actions could be taken by the government to cope with this problem. Firstly, the education need to be changed. Every semester, a trip to the zoo or aquarium is necessary and should be added to the curriculum. The second method is to educate people through social media. Nowadays, the majority of people watching news through social medias and by adding information about the environment, people would have taken more serious actions to this problem. In fact, thanks to the volunteering acts about reducing plastic usage and planting more trees, the minority of people have realised how much we are dependent on nature.
In conclusion, if all the solutions are sincerely taken by the government, the awareness of people would be raised and our planet would be positively different.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | ngocquyet0510 | 78 | view |
- The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries betwwen 1980 and 2008. 73
- The chart gives information about the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia from 1980 to 2010. 84
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world? 78
- In many countries the costs of living are rising What are the effects of this on individuals and society Suggest solutions to this problem 61
- In many countries the costs of living are rising What are the effects of this on individuals and society Suggest solutions to this problem 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ly take action to tackle this issue. There are several reasons why people have not...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...are several reasons why people have not take enough care about the environment. Firs...
^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugh care about the environment. Firstly, thousands of years of evolution has sepa...
^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the curriculum. The second method is to educate people through social media. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09666666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63061251845 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1710697362 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301499643806 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918714298601 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762720044978 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168198632626 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752183930444 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.