The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries betwwen 1980 and 2008.

Essay topics:

The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries betwwen 1980 and 2008.

The pie chart introduces the proportion of the expenditure spent on different household activities between the UK and New Zealand from 1980 to 2008.

A closer look at the pie charts highlights the fact that the money spent on food and drink was reduced in two countries during the ten-year period. Moreover, the British spent a significantly larger percentage of their household budget on leisure activities.

In 1980, 29% budget of New Zealanders went on food and drink, while this number was 6 percent less when compared with their counterparts. After ten years, the budget spent on food and drink in the UK had fallen by 10 percent while in New Zealand, people still spent a quarter of their budget on this ind of expense. Moreover, leisure activities took up the majority of expense in the UK for both years, compared to only 17% in New Zealand in 2008. However, the expense that people spent on utility bills saw an increasing trend in both countries after ten years. The only type of spending that was stabilized throughout this period was transport, which held up about 15% of the budget of the British and New Zealanders.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-01 ngocquyet0510 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...budget on this ind of expense. Moreover, leisure activities took up the majority ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83076923077 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62038737218 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.5756986516 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126619613404 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620035441219 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541539875604 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118033225342 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527378604241 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.