The human's ability has attracted much social concern. A minority of sociologists believe that leadership comes naturally and becoming a leader cannot be a result of learning. Personally, I bear in mind a strong disagreement with this belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is personal development. The fact is that taking part in many social activities creates chances for people to attain more socialization with other ones. Therefore, it is possible for them to enlarge their relationship and gain a lot of valuable experiences in interacting with other people. As a result, they are bound to gradually enlarge their range of relationship and greatly improve their communication skills. Consequently, this plays a crucial role in building the capabilities of becoming a leader. More importantly, it cannot be denied that trying to be optimistic and never give up in any situation possesses a large probability for people to have a habit of coping with obstacles in every aspect of their lives. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for them to have more motivation to come over every difficult matter and obtain a strong attitude. On that ground, needless to say, people are certain to gradually sharpen their existed mental power and be confident to direct other ones. By and large, the way a person develops himself greatly decides whether he is able to lead others in the future.
On the other hand, some people might say that being a leader requires smart thinking and intelligence, which cannot be learned or fully improved. Accordingly, it is impossible to learn to become a leader. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that, in any group, the leader is not always the person who is better than other members but the one who deeply acknowledge the competence of others and be capable of connecting them effectively to work in harmony. It follows that intelligence is a big factor but not the whole. Furthermore, always taking risks doing new things stands a golden chance for people to be exposed to many different circumstances. In this case, it is expected to encourage them to acquire a more thorough reflection of themselves and be more aware of their strengths and weaknesses. Correspondingly, it is apparent that they have a tendency to gradually fill the gaps in their abilities and possibly activate their potential. Subsequently, people will become more competent in their profession and eventually be qualified to be a director of other ones. Beyond any doubt, the idea that leadership cannot be obtained by learning or training is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It is highly likely recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to have a deep understanding of leadership.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 73
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO 7 Independent task 64
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
The humans ability has attracted much social conce...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...lden chance for people to be exposed to many different circumstances. In this case, it is expe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2401.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06540084388 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02040822004 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.812552107 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.041666667 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16473121031 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475728491227 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452836508533 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10290598461 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461512132573 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.