The passage claims that governments should dictate high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy foods by pointing out three reasons for support. Tho lecture, on the other hand, states that this theory can be challenging and refutes each of the author's reasons.
The passage claims that governments should dictate high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy foods by pointing out three reasons for support. Tho lecture, on the other hand, states that this theory can be challenging and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the writer goes on to mention that the policy will encourage people to smoke fewer cigarettes and eat much less unhealthy food, which leads toward a healthier society. On the contrary, the professor rejects this by explaining that more taxes will force smoking people to buy cheaper cigarettes which have lower quality and will be more harmful to them. In addition, will leads who use unhealthy foods, to greater risks because they spend most of their money to buy unhealthy foods and will have less money to buy healthy foods.
Furthermore, the reading argues that people who smoke cigarettes or eat unhealthy foods need more medical care. Therefore, the government could earn some of the money which spend on their medical care from the taxes. Conversely, the listening supports an opposite view as compared to that presented in the passage; she describes that raising taxes is so unfair. Some people have more income and others have less, but if both of whom smoke one packet of cigarette per day, they should pay identical taxes. The professor believes that taxes should be relative to people's income.
Finally, the author explains that with the use of the taxes government can invest in some other projects that have some benefit on public welfare, such as creating parks or build highways for more convenient transportations. The speaker, in contrast, rejects the author's view and illustrates the idea that it will bring up millions of dollars income for the government which they do not want to use it and look at it as a reliable source of revenue. In this situation, they may be let people smoke outdoor in public because they do not want to loose this income.
- The passage claims that increasing salt level in lake's water, which makes it hard for birds and fishes to go on living there and would transform the lake into a dead zone, would be solved the trend which is harmful to the lake's health by point 80
- The passage claims that the box shaped device will not be prosperously interacted by desertification by pointing out three reasons for support The lecture on the other hand states that the reasons which proposed against the use of the box shaped device ar 45
- j 3
- The passage claims that the best colonization option is sending people to an asteroid by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that it is not a very practical idea and refutes each of the author's reasons. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and ex 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...more harmful to them. In addition, will leads who use unhealthy foods, to greater ris...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e. Therefore, the government could earn some of the money which spend on their medical care...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'taxes'' or 'tax's', 'taxis's'?
Suggestion: taxes'; tax's; taxis's
...uthor explains that with the use of the taxes government can invest in some other pro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 545, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...r in public because they do not want to loose this income.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93292682927 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46194829275 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0503991274 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.461538462 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348269603696 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140032394685 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172212535275 0.0662205650399 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312925958288 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.343759251394 0.0443174109184 776% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.