Is it prudent to say that, ''Teachers should present their political views to students in classroom ? Two perspective surfaces while meticulously evaluating this issue. One answers aforementioned question in the affirmative with utmost conviction whereas other perspective makes its disapproval evident by denying its presence. Personally I have proclivity towards thought that teacher should not present their view to classroom It might have some side effects. This can be explained by following example.
First and most important thing is, classrooms are meant for schooling and teaching purpose. They are not good places for discussing such sensitive matter. Generally students are influenced by their teachers and they respect teachers thought of school. If a teacher express their opinion then students will start thinking that this group of politicians is better than other. The schools and colleges will be hot spots to gain votes through teachers thinking.
Students usually think that teachers are ideal and because of their experience they will never be wrong. In case of bad teacher, wrong movement will arise from ashes, helping community to go down. This happened in a college where teacher openly expressed their opinions about social and politics. As time passed due to influence of his thoughts a group of strong rebel thoughts was generated. This group created violence in university campus.
Ideal teacher would explain all types of thoughts to his class and let student choose their sides. Politics and social topics are biggest part of society. Slight disturbance in delicate balance of politics can shiver whole society.
After this holistic analysis, it is evident that all thoughts are in favor of the thought supporting that, teacher shouldn't share their political and social views in classroom. I cogently agree with above thought in the line of its reasoning.
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
- #6 If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people say that tourism has many negative effects on the countries that people travel to. How true is this statement? What can tourists do to reduce the harmful effects of tourism on local cultures and environments? 83
- Advances in transportation and communication like the airplane and the telephone havechanged the way that nations interact with each other ·in a global society. Choose anothertechnological innovation that you think is important. Give specific reasons for 70
- always telling truth is important consideration is any relationship. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hey respect teachers thought of school. If a teacher express their opinion then st...
^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eir opinions about social and politics. As time passed due to influence of his tho...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the biggest'.
Suggestion: are the biggest
...their sides. Politics and social topics are biggest part of society. Slight disturbance in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...of the thought supporting that, teacher shouldnt share their political and social views ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44557823129 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63032062932 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5261092285 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.05 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.45110844103 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28631484972 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841797823491 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854465025799 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161945135232 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032397483824 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.