Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
The dilemma of appealing to the masses or to act by one’s own judgment is ubiquitous in all governments. I strongly agree with the claim that government officials should rely on their own judgments rather trying to satisfy the will of the people unquestioningly for two reasons.
Most conspicuously, the demands of the people need not necessarily benefit themselves in the long run. To illustrate, let us look at the example where the government is proposing to construct a nuclear power station and the people are opposing it citing health and relocation reasons. The demands of the people are myopic and they aren’t considering the benefits in the long run. With the construction of the nuclear power plant, people will enjoy the uninterrupted power and new employment opportunities. It is also a sustainable alternative to non-renewable and polluting fuels, such as coal and natural gas, which are used to produce electricity currently. However, if the government official decides to act according to the will of the people, the city might suffer due to unavailability of electricity and acrid pollution in the coming years. Therefore, it is pertinent for the government to act according to their own judgement. Thus, proving my point of view.
Furthermore, the demands of various people are often contradictory and the government ends up with a slow and sloppy implementation if it chooses to act according to the will of the people. Consider the situation where the government needs to dispense funds to different sectors. Some people might want the government to focus on allocating a higher portion of the funds to transportation sector citing transportation is the key to globalization, while some might want government to allocate high funds in the education sector citing education will improve employment scenarios. If the government officials fail to decide based on their own volition and thereby catering to the whims of the people, development of the economy might be exacerbated. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that government officials should rely on their own judgement and thus, supporting my point of view.
In conclusion, I reiterate the aforementioned examples that strongly suggests that government officials should rely on their judgment in making major decisions than unquestioningly catering to the will of the people they serve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | AAAA2222 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | shoeb_athar | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 50
- "The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine: “Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a 75
- Science has no meaning without religion 50
- Science has no meaning without religion 54
- University should require every student to take a variety of courses outside of the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, b 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to the will of the people they serve.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.368 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23419067671 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1695954125 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.8125 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428762276602 0.243740707755 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132016799845 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137280140497 0.0758088955206 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315724301922 0.150359130593 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125154928071 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.