Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
The writer of the issue believes that instead of unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whose government serves, they should rely on their own judgment. In my opinion, this attitude is not completely true.
First of all, In my opinion, people choose the government officials to be their voice and power. So what if the government do not act as people need? I think because of this reason government officials should server as people will unless they will lose the people trust. For example in my country Iran, government do not act as people will and always rely on their own decision. As a result, today people lost their trust to them and they will not engage in voting because they believe whoever they choose does not serve for them but just for himself will.
Another reason is that if the government carry out the will of people then people join the government to help them. This partnership helps the society to develop and as a result, there will be a happy and developing country. For example, in my country, because what I mentioned above people see themselves apart from government thus they do not join the government. Because they believe what government do is not because of them and for development of the country and its different with their will.
In contrast, some may think that government need to rely on their own decisions if they want to do what they plan for the development of the society and if they carry out people will they fail as the people may not know what is good for them. I have to say that, the government will not be separated from people will, and if there is a contrast in people and government attitudes, the government should try to convince people who their decision is right.
In the last word, because of what I mentioned I believe the attitude of the writer is not true and it can only be true if the concerned I mentioned above solve in some way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | AAAA2222 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | shoeb_athar | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a sign 59
- Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, thus, apart from, for example, i think, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57434402332 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46563474397 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.393586005831 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4791503789 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447983482746 0.243740707755 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191085567927 0.0831039109588 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143866140223 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28531331566 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160560696342 0.0667264976115 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 48.8420337079 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 100.480337079 40% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.