When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success.
Some people say that success depends solely on hard work where there is no place for luck. Hard work pays off big time to ensure success. However, I strongly disagree with the statement and believe that even when there is no lacking from a person’s side, things still can go wrong. In the next two paragraphs it has been discussed why.
First of all, luck plays a certain part in a person’s success because, as there are lots of uncertainty associated with our lives, we cannot fully ensure success based on hard work alone. For example, let’s say that a very meritorious student studied really hard and gave tremendous effort for a test, but on the test day, he had a nervous breakdown for some reason and could not do well in the exam. This does not prove that the boy did not work hard, but due to sheer bad luck he failed. If luck favored him that day, he might have emerged out of the situation victorious. So, this is important to have luck on someone’s side after having given real good efforts.
Second of all, luck is important in the sense that there are lots of external contributing factors to a person’s success. For example, in the case of getting corporate jobs in the Indian sub-continent, sometimes luck outruns a hard work of a person. There might be cases where there are some candidates up for a position but just because one or two of them have internal link-ups with the authority (maybe they have relatives in top position), they are chosen for the position despite having a very qualified person in line. It is not the latter’s fault that he got rejected, he had every bit of qualification, maybe even more. It is the dumb luck that got him out of the competition. So, as long as other competing factors are in play, luck will still continue to have some effect on the outcome.
To sum up, it is really a tough job to determine how much hard work or luck attribute towards a person’s success. Hard work can be a very crucial contributing factor. Nonetheless, we cannot simply deny the role of luck because only hard work cannot define success and as long as uncertainties surround our lives, having a good luck on our side can ensure our desired success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | sadra1988 | 30 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Polina1607 | 65 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | solankis304 | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | Dokdo | 100 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | bikram | 80 | view |
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 50
- As early as the twelfth century a.d., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in NewMexico in the American Southwest were notable for their “great houses,” massivestone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or fourstories high. Archae
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, really, second, so, still, well, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65989847716 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66106675045 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9245109931 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324484606329 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107076335844 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076888871069 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221008072683 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566020180962 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.