Leadership ability has been a burning global issue. Some specialists suggest that this ability cannot be learned because it is a natural skill. Personally, I disagree with this suggestion.
On one hand, what I put in my priority is good leadership. The fact is that when receiving a wide variety of knowledge, managers are highly likely to determine the surrounding environment with many perspectives. Therefore, they have a tendency to realize the weakness and the strength of their people. As a result, it creates chances for leaders to understand their people profoundly. Correspondingly, it is the essence of leaders that are able to gain lots of success in their path of leading people. More importantly, when striving to study, leaders are certain to be put into the full knowledge that is discovered. Accordingly, their academic level inclines to leap a huge distance. For this reason, there is a likelihood that people obviously admire the leader as a knowledgable person. Hence, it follows that it is possible for them to give more trust to their manager. In that case, the thriving ability to become a leader is bound to happen. Beyond any doubt, a person who gives the effort to study encourages the success to exist in their leader career.
On the other hand, it is claimed that the skills needed for a leader is extremely hard to perceive. Consequently, it causes the result of the effort is not expected. However, it is just applicable to a minority. In fact, the learners always are enthusias about their dream. Subsequently, they are certain to put their mind on the knowledge that they want to comprehend. In addition, a person that has a long path of learning is supposed to deeply know about areas in the present. Successively, it stands a golden chance for them to explore the potential in these areas, the successful ability of them. Thus, it involves the leader in finding an effective direction. Thereupon, it creates chances for them to increase the economy and other aspects of the development process. Under this circumstance, their career of being a leader is bound to flourish remarkably. By and large, the claim that the leader’s skills cannot be learned is unrealistic.
In summary, all the factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my writing. It is strongly advised that specialists should take my writing into great consideration to guideline an appropriate policy on leadership ability.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 70
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 76
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
...le to a minority. In fact, the learners always are enthusias about their dream. Subsequent...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in fact, in summary, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07711442786 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96508752253 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5687443547 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5925925926 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8888888889 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25925925926 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156752531187 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413031584485 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407242981327 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958450092631 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364984159399 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.