The issue both the reading and the listening focus on is batteries evidence, but the listening casts doubt at three main points
At the first point, the reading states that batteries are usually attached with electricity conductors. But there is no evidence that shows the existence of them. According to the listening, the founders of vessels are not archaeologists. For this reason, there could be metal wires located nearby the vessels, but the founders find them unimportant.
At the second point, the reading believes that there are other copper cylinders with the shame shape of these inside the jars. But they are not used as batteries. On the contrary, the listening argues that they can have lots of function. People can realize that these can be used as batteries over time.
At the last point, the reading mentions that there was no device that relied on electricity. Therefore, the batteries were useless for ancient people. However, the listening confirms that batteries could have some values. They can be used in healing. In addition, people could show the magical things to others with these.
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 66
- TPO17(independent)Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 73
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO7It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 73
- TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, therefore, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 183.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10928961749 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52814784925 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3103974808 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.9230769231 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0769230769 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281278476057 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103842710431 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464482149318 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155803952152 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087276188285 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.