Work scheme has been a burning global issue. Some workers suggest that they feel happier when doing various types of tasks instead of similar task during a day. Personally, I agree with this suggestion.
On one hand, what I put on my priority is personal satisfaction. The fact is that doing similar things for a long time obviously pushes workers to fall into boredom. As a result, switching the type of job is certain to break the boredom effectively. Therefore, workers have a tendency to be gain a great deal of motivation when starting with the new work. Correspondingly, it is bound to augment the proficiency of them, and the work is able to be done in a short period of time. Accordingly, their free time is encouraged to stretch, it stands a golden chance for them to reach the things that they really want to do such as reading a book or listening to a favorite song. For this reason, their life inclines to be filled with happiness. More importantly, when facing with lots of works, people are highly likely to learn much information from the execution process. Hence, it is suggested that their knowledge is supposed to be ameliorated remarkably. In that case, it is possible for them to acquire a prosperous career in life. Subsequently, it sets the first foundation for a fruitful life. Beyond any doubt, a wide variety of tasks encourage workers to step into the sweetest moments in life.
On the other hand, it is claimed that lots of works are extremely fatiguing. Successively, the life in the workers' mind is certain to turn to dark color. However, it is just applicable to a minority. In fact, workers always arrange their works in a suitable order of time. Thus, all of the works are supposed to be done without difficulty. In addition, taking part in many jobs is a precious opportunity for workers to know more people and surrounding environments. Thereupon, they have a tendency to extend their relationship to a larger scale. Under this circumstance, it is advised that whenever they encounter obstructions in life and career, they always have friends to help them overcome these hard periods. Wherefore, the bond between them is certain to become more cohesive. As a result, it is apt to bring lots of relaxing moments to their life. By and large, the claim that different works cause people to fall into the dark world is unrealistic.
In summary, all the factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my writing. It is strongly advised that workers should take my writing into great consideration to guideline an appropriate policy on work scheme.
- TPO 39 - integrated writing 3
- TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 70
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 66
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... the work is able to be done in a short period of time. Accordingly, their free time is encour...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...orks in a suitable order of time. Thus, all of the works are supposed to be done without d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in fact, in summary, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86199095023 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8322584136 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533936651584 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.160328845 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.75 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7857142857 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231018262373 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505460713338 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809274479458 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15456202475 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939507255082 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.