The table provides information about sold mobile phones over a period of 6 years.
There are two clearly visible trends. Whilst Apple started selling their mobile phones only in 2007 they confidently increased sales in about 6 times by 2009, but they also gradually managed to multiply their sellings in approximately 2 times each year, excluding 2012.
Conversely, the majority of companies felt only decline in sales except for Samsung, whose amount of sold phones progressively rose, and Nokia, whose sellings dipped only in 2012 from 422 to 335 million. Motorola felt a noticeable drop in mobile phone realization for the whole time period. Their sales decreased in about 7,5 times for 6 years, from 210 million to 28, what equated them to Ericsson by the end of 2012.
Therefore, with exception of Apple and Samsung, the quantity of sold mobile phones decreased in 2012. The difference between companies was relatively high in 2006 and drastically changed in 2012.
- the graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 85
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children 71
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- Writing task 2 (an essay)Internet contains a lot of information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, therefore, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1572327044 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63495743276 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.1503015119 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196555300832 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101171469543 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100329024132 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150572461347 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113586508544 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.