Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies?
Recently, the phenomenon of travelling to study is over-rated and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that brilliant scholars can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the locally study can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, really necessary for tertiary studies might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of travelling to study far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | ghazal123 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | bradkina | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | bradkina | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | mndpsngh21 | 77 | view |
- Some people think that technology improves the quality of life whereas others feel that creates a new problem that threatens the quality of life. Discuss both views and suggest your opinion. 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children's act. What is your opinion? 85
- A healthy diet is more effective for keeping fit than exercise. What is your opinion? 11
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 88
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, really, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67226890756 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21315408212 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680672268908 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5690458797 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.727272727 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210742516585 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709034095085 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952463294548 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115101715337 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479885969058 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.18 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.