Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies?
These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about whether tertiary students should travel for their studies to be brilliant. While it is possible to claim that travelling to study can have more sources in terms of educational research, my view is that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.
There are several reasons why travelling to study is over-rated. One of them is that tertiary facilities have high standards outside than local schools as they are more expensive. It can also be argued that travelling to study has more benefits to students because they are going away from home where there is much destruction, for instance, television, bad friends. Moreover, it should be taken into account that tertiary education outside your own society provide students to learn other cultures from different parts of the world.
However, those who argue for local studies have a different view and say that it can actually be a positive thing. Firstly, it can be claimed that local studying promotes one's own culture without going outside, for example, going to other countries. Then, there are concerns about promoting your local studies.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the argument, my opinion is that students should prefer to study in local based institutions as it also provides the same facilities. I would strongly recommend that studying locally brings high standards of education in your own country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.184 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62210907477 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6739993548 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306070611044 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125219833316 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106641651238 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187859244967 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056898885564 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.