The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares information about the number of social networking websites visited by people in Canada in the years 2014 and 2015.
Overall, the number of people visiting one social media website is the highest in both the years.Usage of social media has slightly increased in one year. Moreover, the number of people using multiple sites also increased in one year.
The number of social networking site users slightly went up by 1% in 2015, leaving just above 20% of people with no social media. In contrast, the number of users, who only registered for one social networking site declined by 8%. Multiple site users increased from 2014 to 2015, with 2015 registering slightly more users in two sites with nearly around 25% in both the years.Three site users were 12% in 2014, It went up by 4% in 2015 making 16% of the total population use three sites. Four-site users also went up by 3% in one year. Finally, the total population of five site users doubled in a year. In both years, five site users are minimum with 2% and 4% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Shivam7090 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Sagar Gurung | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | phanduydat | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world- wide, we should be conce 56
- The bar chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 73
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010. 73
- stress-related illnesses are becoming increasingly common. what do you think are the causes of this?what solutions can you suggest? 84
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, moreover, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71657754011 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34924357009 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491978609626 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7185452961 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1818181818 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272600685325 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122205626081 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100026742531 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182346866088 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113337336962 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.