Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Human actions has already put a lot of animals in dengare of distinction. Increase in human population, means more need for food, housing and products, which means more and more invading of the animal territories. Some people think that it's reasonable to sacrifice the animals for our need. I hold a complete opposite opinion about this issue due to the following reasons.
First, more industry and more food, would result in a better quality of life from many aspects. This better quality would result in a higher welfare and consequently the rise in the population. This increase in population, again creates the need for more industry, shelter etc. As of today, we have already enourmasly invaded the animal territories and we have already ruined our environment with issues like global warming, and we have left no environmental resources for the next generation. In the long run, this global warming would put animals in danger due to the impacts it could have on all environmental aspects of a habitat. For example change in pattern of raining could affect the growing of the food necessary for animals to survive.
Secondly, by putting these animals in more danger, we increase the possibility of their extinction. Their extinction, would result in malfunctioning eco system. This malfunctioned eco system would not only affect the animals, but also the humans. For example, if the fly extinct, the frogs would have any food too eat and they become in danger of extinction as well. This can go on and on until no animals are left on the planet.
All in all, Increasing the number of farmlands and factories could only result in more problem for the human themselves, as it can cause global warming and it can ruin the eco system and life cycle of animals, which in the long time, would affect the human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Dimitrina | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Manu2525 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | bishoy | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to eat'?
Suggestion: to eat
... extinct, the frogs would have any food too eat and they become in danger of extinction...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 15.1003584229 7% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90291262136 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65739346579 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508090614887 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9142475951 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6875 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185491950476 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068869643873 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060050545601 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123568873693 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498545655616 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.