The great majority of people, especially students have experienced a situation that a teacher or lecture says something incorrect. There are some ways to react to this event. Some people react nothing, some people will tell this subject in a private talking with lecturer, and some people interrupt the lecturer and mention the correc point. As far as I am concerned, the last option is the best action. I will explain my reasons in ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, most of the people learn and obtain their knowledge by being in class or meeting. In better words, They will accept their teachers or meeting leaders words. If a person learn an incorrect subject in class and she never know the correct subject, it would be harmful for that person or society. For instance, I studied economics in university. Once, my macroeconomics professor states that economist believe that there is no relationship between money and price index base on the monetary schools. I knew, his words was incorrect, but I never told him. A few days later, I saw an article from my microeconomic class about the monetary school and he exactly repeated that error. In better words, this incorrect thought was spreading among people even policy makers. Therefore, it is necessary to correct lecturer when she is telling something incorrect.
In addition, although some lecturer will be unhappy when we correct their wrong words, they finally will admit that this correction will help them. In other words, some teachers tell some incorrect stuff for years, since students never correct her. While if somebody states the teacher error, she is able to correct this and never repeats it again. Thus, the lecturer might be sad for our statement specially in a public place, but she will be happy that she never repeat it again.
Last but not least, some people do not spend enough time for being ready as a teacher or meeting leader. In better words, they never mind about the students’ and audiences’ time and mind. They just want to do their work carelessly. There is an important solution for solving this problem. We should alarm these people error in front of others, these notifications will be useful for them to prepared better for teaching and speaking. For instance, we had a history teacher in high school and he told us some incorrect materials and we did not mind. One day, we decided to correct his errors consequently. After just few sessions, he never stated incorrect things and he became the best history teacher in our city.
All in all, I think it is essential to correct people specially teachers and meeting leaders when they tell something incorrect. Of course, we should do this activity in a respectful manner.
- tpo 36Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, 3
- TPO 41 - integrated writing 80
- T-P-O 34 3
- TPO 35- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The “Voynich manuscript,” as it 75
- TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
...ncorrect subject in class and she never know the correct subject, it would be harmfu...
^^^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a respectful manner" with adverb for "respectful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... Of course, we should do this activity in a respectful manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, in addition, of course, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94565217391 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58884750033 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.751561816 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.25 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142966140339 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440442531569 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447966489454 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970712032792 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327913397648 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.