Bar chart
Two bar charts provide information about the proportion of marriages or divorces and the relationship status of adults in the USA during the period 1970 and 2000.
Overall, it is obvious that the rate of marriages outnumbered that of divorces. Besides, the middle-age population which had married status occupied the largest share.
The number of marriages remained stable in the first two years 1970 and 1980, then slightly decreased to 2 million in 2000, which was accounted for 2 million. conversely, the divorces proportion witnessed a softly rise in 1980, which was approximately 1.5 million although there was no difference between the beginning point and the endpoint of the period, the number was accounted for 1 million.
The majority of people who were single in 1970 was lower compared with that in 2000, in contrast with other sectors. People who married significantly outweighed other categories in both years, which were 70% and 60% respectively, these numbers were threefold those of people who never married and sixfold those of people who widowed and divorced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Bar chart 78
- Some people think that printed books are no longer necessary in this digital era as all writing can be stored electronically Others think that printed books still play important roles Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 96
- Many people think that the government should spend money to explode the outer space, while others believe it's a waste of public money. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Some cities have vehicle-free days, when private cars, trucks, motorcycles are banned in the city center. Public transportation like buses, taxis, and metros are advised. To what extent do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Education 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conversely
...000, which was accounted for 2 million. conversely, the divorces proportion witnessed a so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('softly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...sely, the divorces proportion witnessed a softly rise in 1980, which was approximately 1.5 mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, first, if, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26589595376 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78007641722 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.721758301 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0640229195073 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359225767753 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879919833455 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628645093568 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108884524199 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.