TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task
The lecture which professor gives imposes critical disagreement to the content of article.
The first reason which is imposed by professor is in contradiction to the point that ethanol manufacture would add to global warming issues caused by carbon dioxide emission. he asserts that the process of producing ethanol fuel comprises of growing plants through time which could absorb a much amount of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere that is a much greater amount compared to the amount of CO2 released during ignition process.
The second reason in contrast to article is the fact that producing ethanol is not bound to the use of animal food and it could be obtained from cellulose in various parts of a plant.
The third and the last reason is in regard to higher prices of ethanol in a condition that costs would not be supported by the government. professor has a positive prospect of the future in the ethanol production industry and he assumes that if the command for the ethanol fuel would be increased in the future, the production of ethanol will increase subsequently and as a result the costs would decline significantly. The exact prediction would be if the utilization increases by 3 times compared to the current situation, the costs would decrease to 40 percent.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-08 | theprasad | 80 | view |
2022-02-01 | omega93 | 70 | view |
2021-02-24 | alibenvari | 80 | view |
2021-02-09 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
2020-11-15 | Steven Beckett | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 22 Integrated Writing Task 42
- TPO-23 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...sues caused by carbon dioxide emission. he asserts that the process of producing e...
^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...t the process of producing ethanol fuel comprises of growing plants through time which coul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ethanol fuel comprises of growing plants through time which could absorb a much a...
^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...plants through time which could absorb a much amount of carbon dioxide from the atmos...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Professor
...uld not be supported by the government. professor has a positive prospect of the future i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08372093023 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74493486039 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520930232558 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7846985128 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.142857143 110.228320801 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365741011425 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156123771577 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851819725349 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179241173727 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111531805726 0.0443174109184 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.