Advantage and Disadvantage of Raising Petrol Prices
Nowadays, it is true that the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problem is by increasing the petrol’s prices. In this essay I completely disagree with that statement because it gives more disadvantage rather than advantage for some reasons.
In the one hand the main demerit of this problem is that things can distract global economic especially in developing countries. It is because petrol’s prices are one of the factor that can influence global market beside gold and economic policies from developed countries like United Stated and China. For example in Indonesia, if the prices is raisen it can influence other prices be grow up too. Because petrol is a basic material that can be used in almost every sectors. As result it causes damaged economic conditions in particularly for poor people. There is no doubt that things is a best choice of the problem to be tackled.
On the other hand, the benefit of this case is that things is good for environment. It is due to that way can restrict million of people to acces petrol which the prices is too high. Taken as an example is if just only wealthy people can buy and many people moved to use public transportation that can be reduced using of petrol. Therefore it can be decline traffic and also the pollutions in to the air from cars emission. It is clear that the choice is a good for the situation.
From where I stand that the government shoukd been keept the balancing of petrol prices and improve to good qualities of public transport services which can make people move from private transport to public transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-28 | idid382003 | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | rahulchd | 95 | view |
| 2020-08-24 | anvyylad | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | delizius | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this problem is that things can distract global economic especially in developing...
^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... influence other prices be grow up too. Because petrol is a basic material that can be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...eople. There is no doubt that things is a best choice of the problem to be tackle...
^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ent. It is due to that way can restrict million of people to acces petrol which the pri...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n example is if just only wealthy people can buy and many people moved to use pub...
^^
Line 9, column 333, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...on that can be reduced using of petrol. Therefore it can be decline traffic and also the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e choice is a good for the situation. From where I stand that the government s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, for example, in particular, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85559566787 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63495867277 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530685920578 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0040339826 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0714285714 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181239195532 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575243023792 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561758809688 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110062814636 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288266593435 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.