Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Other disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Each country has its own customs and manners. And it is a topic of contention whether visitors to other countries should follow loacl customs and behaviors or not. In this essay I will discuss both of these views and reach a logical conclusion.
There is a famous proverb that when in Rome do as the Romans. It means that while visiting another country visitors should try to embrace that particular country’s cultures and traditions, because that is the whole point of visiting a different country. People visit other countries to experience cultures that are different from their own. And indulging oneself into that culture is a great way of accomplishing that. The common purpose of visiting another country is to know that country in a detailed fashion which requires visitors to follow that country’s cultural traits. It helps them to blend in the lives of the local population and get a real experience about the day to day life of the surroundings.
While visitors should follow local traits, some people disagree with it by holding the view that the host country country should welcome cultural differences. And this is indeed true at this modern age of globalization. We live in a global village where cultures from all over the world are getting mixed together and being respected by everyone. In order to establish unity among people from different cultures it is important that a host country becomes tolerant to other cultures. But although it is up to the visitors what custom they should follow, it is beneficial for them to follow the local customs and behaviors.
Overall from the above argument, it is clear that while it is important for host countries to welcome cultural differences, visitors should try to follow local customs in order to achieve a great experience.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 61
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 52
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
- Some people claim that the government should provide free health care Others think that the government will not provide the most innovative methods of treatment and it s better to invest those funds in education and culture What is your opinion 82
- "Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a detailed fashion" with adverb for "detailed"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...another country is to know that country in a detailed fashion which requires visitors to follow that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: country
...th it by holding the view that the host country country should welcome cultural differences. An...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74163576477 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0946289448 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 7.06120827912 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499144610972 0.244688304435 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161226497844 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139287336901 0.0667982634062 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324206805714 0.151304729494 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699787514036 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.