the unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. what are those problems? in order to reduce the problem, should we discourage people to use car?
Environment has been a subject that attracts great attention in recent years. It is argued that uncontrolled increase of using private car could adversely affect the surroundings. This essay aims to elaborate on a couple of issues and some possible cures for that.
The dramatic growth of car use may brings a number of repercussions to the society. First of all, the burning of fossil fuel which directly release exhausted fumes into the surroundings contribute to severe consequences namely air pollution and eventually global warming. In addition, it also has detrimental impacts on human's daily life and leads to deteriorating health especially respiratory diseases. Traffic congestion is another problem owing to a large number of private vehicles in the street during the rush hours. Commuters may suffer from negative feelings like irritated or impatient when they are not reach the destination punctually.
To solve this problems, restricting the number of private car could be a potential solution. However, when the government levies taxes on car production and consequently raises car price, it is likely to discourage a large number of potential customers because of the inadequate financial capability. Furthermore, altering the public transport facilities might be the better way to curb the consumption of private vehicles. Commuters have more opportunities to access cheaper means of transport and the traffic problems could be alleviated as a result.
In conclusion, the excessive car use has caused accumulating ramifications with regard to human's physical health. In my opinion, discourage the car consumption might be a feasible cure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | Minhthuminhthumingthu | 61 | view |
- in spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people in the world still go hungry.why is this the case?what can be done about this problem 56
- Spend finance on art 56
- Spend finance on art 56
- units of electricity by fuel source in Australia and France 78
- some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.discuss both views and your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... congestion is another problem owing to a large number of private vehicles in the street during t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e destination punctually. To solve this problems, restricting the number of pri...
^^^^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s car price, it is likely to discourage a large number of potential customers because of the inad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57480314961 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11302575991 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0469634606 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224575998544 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713930891996 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685694538588 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132556251844 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044805095958 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.