the following two pie charts show the results of survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1995 and 1985
The charts illustrate the proportion of recreational activities which adults spent time in Europe in 1985 and 1995.
Overall, as can be seen, Europe people tended to take their major time to sit in front of the TV screen and playing computer games became one of the most prevalent activities in 1995.
The most striking feature was the number of people who watched TV as their main leisure activities, around 32% in 1985 and slightly decreased to 30% in the next 10 years. By contrast, the figure for communicating with friends had a moderate rise from 21% in 1985 to 26% in 1995.
Talking with the beloved ones and eating out took a high position in 1985 approximately 18% and 23% respectively, however, they all significantly dropped just hovering from 7 to 8 % 10 years later. At the same time, there was a dramatic growth in playing computer games, about 27%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-08 | Minhthuminhthumingthu | 61 | view |
- in spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people in the world still go hungry.why is this the case?what can be done about this problem 61
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- the following two pie charts show the results of survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1995 and 1985 61
- the unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. what are those problems? in order to reduce the problem, should we discourage people to use car? 61
- units of electricity by fuel source in Australia and France 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 718.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75496688742 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70220202347 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675496688742 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6682942398 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135971309728 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697229826368 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688899221478 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938948672946 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737496807288 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.