It is much more convenient to watch a movie on television or computer than buy a ticket and go to the cinema. In the nearest future the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline.
Do you agree or disagree?
Watching movies has become one of the main passions in our civilization since the appearance of the cinematography. Nowadays the risk of disappearance of cinemas is high, because people prefer to stay at home and enjoy films on the screens of their gadgets rather than visiting movie theatre. I completely agree to this statement and believe, that cinema outing will lose its popularity quite soon and this fact will make hundreds screening rooms go bankrupt.
First of all, the ticket at the cinema is getting pricier from year to year. If cinema lovers visit movie theatre on weekends and buy popcorn or a Coke, they must be ready to bid farewell to several thousand rubbles. For example, last time my friends and I spent all our scholarship on booking tickets to “Gone with the wind”. This situation spoilt our mood and enriched the owner of the cinema. In other words, if you look after pennies, the dollars will look after themselves.
What is more, the meaning of convenience has increased in the 21st century. Limitation of freedom in the screening room makes humans feel uncomfortable. For example, no one is able to stop the movie in the cinema, while visiting the bathroom, but all of these is allowed at home. What is more, food made by cinema workers is unhealthy and can even be tasteless in contrast to home cooking. Thus, the atmosphere in the person’s flat is unique and obviously cozier than in any movie theatre.
Taking everything into consideration I would like to say, that the amount of cinemas is gradually decreasing. It can be concluded that the majority of film fans choose comfort and economy, thereby contributing to reduce the number of screening rooms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | mostafa jahangiri | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-15 | Enkhamgalan | 78 | view |
- Tourism has negative environmental impacts on tourist areas What are these impacts How can damaging impacts be lessened 67
- Some people think that couples should live together before getting married to start knowing each other better and see if they are compatible Others say that because of this tendency people become immoral and only deep emotional attachment makes a durable 84
- Unemployment remains the biggest challenge to school leavers in most countries How far do you agree with this assessment What other challenges face young people today 84
- There is no need to maintain a close relationship with distant relatives Do you agree or disagree with this statement 85
- Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd believe, that cinema outing will lose its popularity quite soon and this fact ...
^^
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te soon and this fact will make hundreds screening rooms go bankrupt. First of ...
^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o reduce the number of screening rooms.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to, in other words, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94773519164 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74621052198 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5348360309 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255123586344 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712568556922 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405739532595 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134432306026 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575947766159 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.