Nowadays there is a new trend of replacing traditional cars to electric ones, because of their benefits and advantages. However, I stand a different opinion with two key factors, which include significant difficulties in recycling and replacing, also batteries are not very environmentally friendly.
Automobiles have been widely used since the industrial revolution and currently there have been millions of cars running daily which burn billions of litres of fossil fuels annually. If governments present a new policy to replace all of them, it will be very troublesome and significant. Another big problem is how to recycle or renovate these exist cars and once the unwanted materials have been collected, how to reuse them in an environmentally friendly way. For instance, the closure of millions of petrol station and those underground pipelines for gases may become useless and it creates a potential danger when undergoing construction with these flammable fluids.
On the other hand, batteries may cause more environmental problems when not recycling properly. The battery will lose its efficiency by time and need to be replaced which creates new problems. Furthermore, if the battery is left in the motor vehicles for a long time, it will gradually lose its electricity and eventually start to leak some acid liquid which could damage not only the engine room but also the soil underneath the parking. Take the mobile phone, for example, the Li-ion battery is designed to be recharged fully up to 500 times, after exceeding this number, its capacity would drop to 70 per cent or less. Either replacing or keep using it, both may cause other problems which are the storage of used battery and poor remaining power, respectively.
Given the above points, simply banning fossil fuel forced automobile and taking electric ones as an alternative is not the perfect solution. As there will be more problems with recycling and replacing the present fuel cars, in addition, the batteries used in electric vehicles that may have potential problems.
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion. 84
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion. 56
- Failure is proof that the desire wasn’t strong enough.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27051671733 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83851197779 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604863221884 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.6835039885 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.384615385 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167513909957 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063307936563 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499966745264 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110828501606 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433291949004 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.