Nowadays, as the world is rapidly changing to be more complex and modern, individuals have to be up-to-date with new skills. In this regard, some people claim that governments should consider a budget of money for adults to learn new techniques with a training course. I agree up to a point, but I also believe that other types of teaching could also be beneficial for these groups of people.
To begin with, teaching new skills to adults’ employees over the age of twenty-five has a lot of benefits for both governments and the employees. Firstly, governments can utilize a higher proportion of the power of a society, as the rate of proper working will be escalated, for these types of workers can do their tasks more properly. Secondly, as the adults learn new skills, they can do their works with more confidence and energy, which definitely has a positive influence on their life expectancy. Therefore, these courses not only can have benefits for the governments, but also increase the rate of life expectancy in the society.
However, as mentioned above, there are more ways to assist the adults to learn new skills, instead of spending time and money on a training subject. For a particular example, governments can release a training CD or online classes, which noticeably requires the fewer amount of money in comparison with a training course. Training courses not only need available high-qualified teachers and vacant classes, but also must be in a proper time for every person, which means everyone must spend a particular time for these classes. However, with other types of teaching, everyone can enjoy an abundance of choices in all categories in any time. Therefore, it is better for the adult communities to have various choices to learn these new skills.
In conclusion, there are several reasons which are persuasive enough that although governments should support individuals over the twenty-five for learning new abilities, only spending money on training courses is not useful and appropriate for everyone. Therefore, with this in mind, other ways of learning these new techniques should also be considered.
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
- Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation, trying to decide between two places to visit. Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice? Why?-- Reading about the places online--Discussing the pl 76
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13714285714 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82574750811 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6030807337 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.428571429 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292162748178 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117828991068 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048933313745 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195146543778 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00944023039336 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.