The bar graph illustrate the amount of coffee and meat in kilograms consumed by an individual per year in Norway, France, Germany, United States of America, Russia, China and Japan.
Overall, the majority of people in USA were consumers of meat, while, Japan has the least. Further, people in Norway consumed more coffee, compared to other six countries, as people from China were the least consumers of coffee. The figures of meat consumed in all countries were relatively high, comparing with low coffee consumption in those countries.
The number of people who consumed meat was high in USA, at 122 kilograms per person, in contrast with Japan which had 42 kilograms for an individual. Highlighted on the graph, meat consumers continued to declined in Germany, France, Norway, China and Russia as they record 87, 72, 60, 47 and 45kgs respectively.
It is of note that in all these seven countries coffee coffee consumption was not so popular, as Norway recorded 9kgs of which it was the one with largest number of coffee consumers, while, the least record was from China which had 2 kgs. Similarly, France and Russia had an equal number of coffee consumers, at 5kgs for the whole year. One third of people in Norway consumed coffee, as Germany and USA had 7 and 4kgs respectively.
In conclusion, there is a slight difference in number of consumers of coffee, compared to a huge difference in meat consumers.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps Are the advantages more than disadvantages of such services 95
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. 67
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
- The bar chart below shows figures of annual coffee and meat consumption. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntrast with Japan which had 42 kilograms for an individual. Highlighted on the gr...
^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: coffee
... note that in all these seven countries coffee coffee consumption was not so popular, as Norw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the largest'.
Suggestion: with the largest
...y recorded 9kgs of which it was the one with largest number of coffee consumers, while, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, third, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95815899582 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67263487756 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510460251046 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2676553559 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122891796051 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583853192651 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462161684849 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775485362237 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278374778874 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.