Families who send their children to private school should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, federal support for education has become common for developed countries. Some people believe that families should not give taxes to help the state education system if they send their children to private schools. This essay will completely agree with the view.
One of the key reasons why families ought not give financial support to the federal education system while sending their children to privately owned institutions is that those families are unlikely to avail help for their children. Usually, people voluntarily give taxes to federal funds for education if they avail the government’s support for their own children’s education. Therefore, families should not offer financial support for the local education system since they send their children to private schools instead of public institutions. To illustrate, parents in Malaysia are free from the mandate to pay education taxes if their children are admitted into private schools.
Another significant rationale in favor of this view is that not paying taxes for the state education system will possibly reduce the expenditure burden. In most cases, paying both federal taxes for education and the cost of private schools are expected to mount pressure on the expenditure budget of families. As a result, while sending their children to private schools, families should not donate state taxes to support the education system to lessen the burden of their expenses. For instance, in Hong Kong, both education taxes and the average yearly cost of private schools account about 30% of the per capita income of a family.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the view that families should not education taxes while sending their children to private institutions as they do not obtain federal support for their children’s education and want to reduce the expenditure pressure. In reality, education taxes can be mandatory for those who intend to avail of government support for education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Amarpreet Singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | jahid_107 | 67 | view |
- In many countries senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Today it is common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online.Do the advantages of this new development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people believe that elderly employees are more useful to a company while others believe that young employees are better Discuss both views and give your opinion 59
- In many countries senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will completely agree with the view. One of the key reasons why families ough...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n are admitted into private schools. Another significant rationale in favor o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% of the per capita income of a family. In conclusion, I completely agree with t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46428571429 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7537903776 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438311688312 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0465911101 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.461538462 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458977887783 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205519872613 0.084324248473 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112745613383 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337008372748 0.151304729494 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234708142775 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.