Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.
There is a comon belief, that each student should benefit from the cerain classes of their specialization, and ommit classes which would tax their mind by the unnecesary knowledge. This seems even true for many scientists nowdays. However, is there any part of other fields, in this case humanities, which would offer them knowledge beneficial for their professional and personal development?
First of all, the statement seems very vague at first glance. It states, that Business or Science undergraduates are generally not benefited by any course which consists of Humanities. The first issue which needs to be clarified, in order to objectively and critically analyze the argument is the specification of what the two stated fields consists of. Business, as a fields of study, might give an impression that it focus mostly on cuantitative theory, models and numbres, however, it is necessary to consider, that business is primarily field of social science. Even the practical application to the real world scenarios, as international investment techniques, company development and management techniques, are closely connested and relies on social world. As far as humanities are, as its name indicates, closely related to our social environment, and fields as philosophy closely relates to the way in which we explain world phenomena to ourselves, studying of humanities are highly beneficial to the students of vusiness fields, and for their future careers. Moreover, many highly respected business schools, as ESIC in Valencia for example, teach variety of classes of humanities to their students in order to prepare them to undertand many real world scenarios they will have to face in the future.
On the other hand, considering the sciences, it needs to be specified what kind of sceinces are those argument is mentioning. There are definitely many fields as economics, political science or antropology which rightly enjoy their membership in the category of sciences. They are also in more need of courses in humanities. On the othe part of the spectra are Chemistry, Phisics, Astronomy and so on. They, even if they could benefit from courses in humanities to beter undertanding of the position of their respective field in the human history as well as the consequences of their findings to the humanbeings, should consider courses in the Humanities less then the first group. Nevertheless, humanities are very important for sciences as well and the courses could benefit them highly.
Lastly, it is necessary to specify, what exact courses should be required to teach in the which fields. Medieval literature would not be very beneficial for undergraduates in Chemistry as well, as Thomas Hobbes philosophy would not benefit matematician that much. All the undergraduates, and therefore scientists should primarily focus on their fields, and courses which their faculcies offer. However, matematician would benefit more from history of Florence and subsequently be able able to put the findings of many famous italian matematicians, as Berlounni, to the historical context. The same would apply to astronomers, and the epoque of Gallileos finding.
The way in which undergraduate students could benefit from the courses in the humanities could vary widely, however, certain aspect of these courses would be highly beneficial to their understending of historical context and development of their respective fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | abirtanaz242 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 79 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | Ruchi14 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | qwer_ty | 58 | view |
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems. 66
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 66
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 66
- Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. 55
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a field' or simply 'fields'?
Suggestion: a field; fields
...stated fields consists of. Business, as a fields of study, might give an impression that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 542, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fielded'.
Suggestion: fielded
...to consider, that business is primarily field of social science. Even the practical a...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 97, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'those arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; those arguments
... be specified what kind of sceinces are those argument is mentioning. There are definitely man...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 661, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...consider courses in the Humanities less then the first group. Nevertheless, humaniti...
^^^^
Line 19, column 481, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: able
...history of Florence and subsequently be able able to put the findings of many famous ital...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, for example, kind of, of course, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2923.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47378277154 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02697558359 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466292134831 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 901.8 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4416693247 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.863636364 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32180908887 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925765905763 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852247976732 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192453793244 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548288871376 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.