Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, the world is more complex than the previous generation who lived. With these changes, people have to know that doing a project needs collaboration between members of that project. In my opinion, working in a group of members in a project is more effective than working alone. In the following paragraphs, I will explore into the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my viewpoint.
To begin with, cooperation in a group project gives a role to an individual of that group to accept their responsibility in the project. Youths need to be as part of a group like projects in classes assigned by the teacher to feel that taking responsibility for your actions is an important thing. Moreover, students will learn that they should participate in such crucial matters in which are so important in their society. My own experience demonstrates this topic. When I was in high school, my teacher assigned us to choose our research project, and our members to work together on that project. All of us in our group know the duties, but one of us did not care about the project and we had to do his duties voluntarily. We told this issue to our teacher, and he told us he will face with his feature in his future job. As a result, I have connected to him right now and one of his main problems is that he cannot take responsibility in his work and he is dependent on others. If he had done his duties in that small project in high school, he would be independent in his future life.
Secondly, working in a project can lead to making new friends who are complement to do other projects with each other. Making a friend is a crucial thing in everyone's lives that everyone will attend. That is because people need to connect with others and tell their feelings to them. Furthermore, individuals can use their friend's offers to do a project in the future such as in a university or their future job. Consequently, people always try to find a new one who has common ideas about life.
To sum up, working in a group is better than working alone. This is because of taking responsibility for our actions and finding new people who can be a good partnership.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Solitude, spending time alone, is one of our best teachers. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 48 73
- people communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television. 73
- TPO 48 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... project can lead to making new friends who are complement to do other projects with ea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60206718346 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73948365211 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480620155039 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7413432783 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.05 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217446857663 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677411151139 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614345357401 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133571911027 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533194693268 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.