Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people's health. List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help?
Recently, the phenomenon of poor lifestyles and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of people's health are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that the government's services can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a healthy lifestyle can provide society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of healthy people, are remarkable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of mental and physical health. Hence, beneficial ramifications of governments' services are crucial.
From a scientific point of view, unhealthy lifestyles can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient services are significant. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described unhealthy people. Thus, predicted outcomes of a poor lifestyle are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of healthy lifestyles far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of governments' services prove the significance of people's health, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | joyspacechou0130 | 77 | view |
- If Voting is compulsory in democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy? 88
- Marketing in companies should be based on reputation or short term strategies? 88
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to? Climate change, education, or public health? Explain your idea with examples. 88
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example. 88
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78341013825 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26378564166 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640552995392 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6827198651 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.090909091 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284216903027 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967603070166 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480458668153 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156424310069 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400141450512 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.