Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is well know that all around the world there is public museums and art galleries that resemble to the local city of each. With the advanced life and technology appearing nowadays that is replacing approximately 60% of public shops and computer is being the main source of everything needed and that could be an advantage and a disadvantage at the same time.
To begin with, using the computer is an easy free source for students (school and university), it provides them with full information needed for a current or an urgent assignment at home rather than going to a specific place. Moreover, browsing through a digital object gives you the chance to explore things with words and pictures. For example, if you want to travel to Paris and visit a museum you check the location of the place, tickets and have a look on what historical objects or art work does it contain with a brief informative summary.
On the other hand, it is true that using a computer is a fast to finish an assignment or exploring through images, but this won’t give you the feeling of experience. Proceeding to a public museum or art gallery with your bare foot gives you the adventure of experiencing each and every single item in it. It takes you from the story of a sculpture to the life of painting to end in the creative objects that are exhibited. Furthermore, viewing aged objects and art work inside a closed building takes you deeper to the roots of the city for example, the walls of architecture can talk by itself about the place from the ceiling to the mood of lighting and colors.
In conclusion, we all know that there is somehow 50% of the people uses the digital object rather than going anywhere. In my opinion, exploring things with your naked eyes is a must to feel or examine the richness of the space and its detailed surroundings to know about its importance. Words and pictures with a no touch of chemistry is a waste of time.
- Film stars and music celebrities may earn a great deal of money and live in luxurious surroundings but many of them lead unhappy lives Do you agree To what extent is this the price they pay for being famous 73
- Film stars and music celebrities may earn a great deal of money and live in luxurious surroundings but many of them lead unhappy lives Do you agree To what extent is this the price they pay for being famous 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
It is well know that all around the world there is publ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are public museums'?
Suggestion: there are public museums
... is well know that all around the world there is public museums and art galleries that resemble to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 501, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
...s and art work inside a closed building takes you deeper to the roots of the city for...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 178, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...loring things with your naked eyes is a must to feel or examine the richness of the spa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6387283237 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59077569096 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5417780748 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293123751644 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979247999105 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483339060091 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162619001547 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373732234066 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.