The presented bar chart delineates the figure for job owners from the European Union in the United States in the year 1999.
Overall, it is lucid that the apex point was the British employees, while the nadir indicator was the French staffs in the US, depends on the report in 1999.
It is worth noticing that the number of Italian employees was higher than the quantity of French job owners, made up around 6000 and about 5000 respectively. However, the number of other countries proffesion owners was higher than the figure for French and Italian employees, whereas this ratio was lower than the number of German and British job owners, consisted of 20000.
It is interesting note to that the proportion of German and British engages was 25000 and just above 30000 and the differences between German and British employees consitituted approximately 3000 job owners .
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025. 73
- The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams. 73
- The bar chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States 1999 58
- The chart below shows the number of men and women (in thousand) in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nsitituted approximately 3000 job owners .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04827586207 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54186193822 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.8792201748 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.4 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194946649186 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123945515354 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15344922561 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141919506263 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166833059557 0.0819641961636 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.