The charts provide information about Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana's sales in 1999 and 2004 in five European nations.
The charts provide information about Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana's sales in 1999 and 2004 in five European nations.
Overall, it can be seen that the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee in the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden all increased from 1999 to 2004.
Looking at the first category in more detail, it is evident that the amount of Fairtrade-labelled coffee which was sold in the UK increased from 1,500,000 euros in 1999 to 20,000,000 euros in 2004, which was the largest increased on the first table. Similarly, the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee in Switzerland increased from 3,000,000 euros to 6,000,000 euros. The Fairtrade-labelled coffee's sales in Sweden grew from 800,000 euros to 1,000,000 euros, and it was the smallest increased.
Moving on the second chart, it can be seen that the amount of Fairtrade-labelled bananas which was sold in Switzerland increased tremendously from 15,000,000 euros in 1999 to 47,000,000 in 2004. Similarly, the sales of Fairtrade-labelled bananas in Belgium increased from 600,000 euros to 4,000,000 euros. In contrast, the Fairtrade-labelled bananas' sales in Denmark decreased from 2,000,000 euros to 900,000 euros over the period shown.
- The charts provide information about Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana's sales in 1999 and 2004 in five European nations. 67
- The charts provide information about Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana's sales in 1999 and 2004 in five European nations. 67
- Many people believe that high schools should focus their education on mathematics and science rather than covering a wider range of subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- With the migration of people to cities in search of a better life, many rural areas are now underpopulated. What are some problems associated with a lack of people living and working in rural areas? What solutions could be proposed? 61
- With the migration of people to cities in search of a better life, many rural areas are now underpopulated. What are some problems associated with a lack of people living and working in rural areas? What solutions could be proposed? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, similarly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.28488372093 4.92477711251 128% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.09438980227 2.65546596893 154% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488372093023 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1299732124 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.125 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298042424059 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237196007025 0.103423049105 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.266250802093 0.0843802449381 316% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362909430868 0.15604864568 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.332288683013 0.0819641961636 405% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.14 11.4140731707 168% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.